This can be very expensive for large problems so it is usually worth the effort to determine the sparsity structure. In the worst case, if the structure is unknown, you can set JacobPattern to be a dense matrix and a full finite-difference approximation is computed in each iteration (this is the default if JacobPattern is not set). If it is not convenient to compute the Jacobian matrix J in fun, lsqnonlin can approximate J via sparse finite-differences provided the structure of J - i.e., locations of the nonzeros - is supplied as the value for JacobPattern. Sparsity pattern of the Jacobian for finite-differencing. See Nonlinear Minimization with a Dense but Structured Hessian and Equality Constraints for a similar example. Note 'Jacobian' must be set to 'on' for Jinfo to be passed from fun to jmfun. fsolve uses Jinfo to compute the preconditioner. In each case, J is not formed explicitly. The maximum number of function evaluations or iterations was exceeded. This section provides function-specific details for exitflag and output: Options provides the function-specific details for the options parameters.įunction Arguments contains general descriptions of arguments returned by fsolve. (Note that the Jacobian J is the transpose of the gradient of F.) If fun returns a vector (matrix) of m components and x has length n, where n is the length of x0, then the Jacobian J is an m-by-n matrix where J(i,j) is the partial derivative of F(i) with respect to x(j). % Jacobian of the function evaluated at x Note that by checking the value of nargout the function can avoid computing J when fun is called with only one output argument (in the case where the optimization algorithm only needs the value of F but not J). Then the function fun must return, in a second output argument, the Jacobian value J, a matrix, at x. If the Jacobian can also be computed and the Jacobian parameter is 'on', set by x = myfun is a MATLAB function such as.The function fun can be specified as a function handle. fun is a function that accepts a vector x and returns a vector F, the nonlinear equations evaluated at x. The nonlinear system of equations to solve. This section provides function-specific details for fun and options: Returns the Jacobian of fun at the solution x.įunction Arguments contains general descriptions of arguments passed in to fsolve. Returns a structure output that contains information about the optimization. Returns a value exitflag that describes the exit condition. Returns the value of the objective function fun at the solution x. Pass an empty matrix for options to use the default values for options. Passes the problem-dependent parameters P1, P2, etc., directly to the function fun. Minimizes with the optimization parameters specified in the structure options. Starts at x0 and tries to solve the equations described in fun. = fsolve(.)įsolve finds a root (zero) of a system of nonlinear equations. I was wondering if there are some known differences between the fsolve in python and Matlab, and if there are some known methods to optimize the performance in python.Fsolve (Optimization Toolbox) Optimization Toolboxįor x, where x is a vector and F(x) is a function that returns a vector value. Improvement from the last ten iterations. RuntimeWarning: The iteration is not making good progress, as measured by the After a fraction of a second, the following warning appears with python: /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/amework/Versions/Current/lib/python2.7/site-packages/scipy/optimize/minpack.py:227: With python however, every initial condition produces a different result, and never the correct one. Matlab, no matter how I set the initial values, will always converge to the correct solution. I have exactly the same inputs that are used in Matlab, and after double checking, the set of equations are exactly the same as well. However, there are still problems with the python "fsolve" converging to the correct solution. I have gotten the set non-linear equations set up in python now so that fsolve will handle the real and imaginary parts independently. I have a follow up question to the post written a couple days ago, thank you for the previous feedback:įinding complex roots from set of non-linear equations in python
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |